A Policy brief from the Health Care Cost Institute reports
that Individuals with lower back pain who received physical therapy had reduced
healthcare costs:
When it comes to healthcare costs, the federal government,
medical providers, and payers are attempting to reduce rising spending and
adopt value-based care reimbursement. A number of different strategies have
been implemented including bundled payment models and accountable care
organizations. In the realm of physical therapy, patients with lower back pain
could benefit from reduced healthcare costs.
A policy brief from the Health Care Cost Institute reports
that Individuals with lower back pain who received physical therapy had reduced
healthcare costs when compared to patients who visited with another provider
first. Patients who visited a physical therapist at the beginning of their
treatment were less likely to end up in an emergency room. A lower likelihood
of emergency department visits also produces hospitalization costs.
Since low back pain is a very common occurrence in the healthcare setting and a
likely contribution to disability, these findings are key to reducing medical
spending across the industry. In fact, $90.6 billion in direct healthcare costs
are spent on treating back pain throughout the United States.
The study illustrates that patients who obtained physical therapy services from
a clinic owned by their original physician received twice as many PT visits as
compared to patients who were referred to physical therapy not affiliated with
the referring surgeon. The therapy was also less customized and less intensive,
the researchers found.
The study authors focused on analyzing beneficiary
claims data from six states including Oregon, Washington, Wyoming,
Alaska, Idaho, and Montana. The researchers looked at claims data
showing three different groups of people including those who never saw a
physical therapist, those who saw a physical therapist later in their
treatment, and those who immediately received physical therapy.
The study found that patients who saw a physical therapist
first were also less likely to be prescribed a painkiller when compared to
others who saw a different type of clinician. The policy brief emphasizes that
visiting with a physical therapist first will reduce the use of costly
healthcare services and thereby cut spending across the board.
Researchers from the University of Washington and the George
Washington University also found that taking away state restrictions on
physical therapy could improve health outcomes among those on opioid
prescriptions as well as enhance imaging. Individual states should consider
addressing restrictions on direct physical therapy access, according to the
policy brief.
State restrictions on physical therapy access could affect
overall healthcare costs by impacting the use of differing medical services.
Essentially, in order to reduce healthcare costs, state policymakers should
allow patients direct access to physical therapy without physician referral,
according to the study.
“The findings from this study suggest that seeing a physical
therapist as the first point of care compared to seeing a physical therapist at
a later point in time (or not seeing a PT) reduces utilization of potentially
costly services,” the study from the Health Care Cost Institute stated.
“Of particular interest was the significant decrease in
opioid prescription, ED visits, and imaging for those patients receiving PT
first. The potential reduction in opioid prescriptions is notable given the
increasing awareness on the overprescription of opioids and the high risk of
substance abuse. These findings suggest that having access to PT could have an
impact on healthcare costs including out-of-pocket costs across all settings.”
While reducing healthcare costs is an imperative within the
medical industry, quality care and patient needs come first. However, a study
from the American Physical Therapy Association shows that patient needs may not
come first in a referral-for-profit environment.
“When there is referral-for-profit, and from this data as
related to group therapy and an extended number of visits, it stands to reason
there is increased risk that the patient’s individual needs are of secondary
importance to revenue. This has long been the concern here at the American
Physical Therapy Association (APTA) and it is why we have fought so hard,
alongside our partners in the AIM Coalition, against physician-owned physical
therapy services (POPTS),” American Physical Therapy Association President
Sharon Dunn, PT, PhD, OCS, stated in a press release.
“This study provides further evidence that when the bottom
line takes precedence in healthcare, the patient loses. A patient’s welfare and
recovery should always be the primary focus of treatment.”
The researchers looked at more than 3,000 patients who
underwent total knee replacement surgery. Out of all of these, nearly 19
percent were found to be completed through a physician self-referral process
while 72.3 percent of cases did not have a doctor who had “ownership interest
in physical therapy services.”
The findings show that treatment in a physician-owned
physical therapy setting lasted a week longer than services not affiliated with
the referring physician. About twice as many visits were seen in physical
therapy offices in which the referring doctor had a financial stake.
The issue seems to be that, in physician self-referral
cases, patients were more likely to receive group therapy instead of
individual, one-on-one care, which tends to extend the amount of visits needed
to complete treatment.
This type of physician self-referral practice may improve
revenue for an individual physical therapy clinic, but it only increases
overall healthcare spending and negatively impacts patient care, the researchers
wrote. In order to meet the Triple Aim of Healthcare, providers will need to
look beyond their own revenue cycle and consider patient needs first.
Good study but it may take time in Indian context.
ReplyDeleteGood study but it may take time in Indian context.
ReplyDeleteSame is the case in metro cities, physiotherapy is helping people at large and lowering down cost of treatment. Nice article!
ReplyDeleteSame is the case in metro cities, physiotherapy is helping people at large and lowering down cost of treatment. Nice article!
ReplyDelete